While most fit this “peasant” profile, all kinds of players rent, including ‘elite’ oriented PVP players whose primary game content is low sec piracy, high sec wardecs, or even nullsec PVP.
Eve online querious rental Patch#
Most renters are players that, for whatever reason, cannot or choose not to pay the price of participation that would give them null access essentially for free. Such is their desire for nullsec content that they will pay large amounts of ISK for the privilege of being left alone in their ‘own’ patch of space. That this property was leased in the middle of a volatile shooting war makes the cashflow even more remarkable. I rented some systems that we held for just a few days before flipped them, and a few high end renters flipped back and forth between our rental alliance and ’s rental alliance, in some cases paying both sides 6 billion ISK per month at the same time while the front lines were on their doorstep. Had consolidated power in Tenerfis and Omist, it would have stabilized a rental income between 150 to 200 billion ISK per month. If I could pull together 60+ billion ISK per month with ’s modest ability to project power, what kind of income could large power blocks achieve? With my income goal met and only a fraction of Tenerifis rented, I started advertising on the Eve Online forums, and in a few weeks I had surpassed the technetium income we had in the North. After Omist fell and was added to our rental portfolio, we achieved a peak income of about 60 billion per month. Tenerifis Diplomacy circa 2011 – “Give me your ISK and I will spare your life” I would send cloaked campers into hostile renter systems, soften them up with a hot drop or two, and then shake them down for ISK. The velocity in which the ISK came in was shocking, as renters eagerly lined up to hand over their ISK to avoid even a modest amount of wrath.įigure 2.
Eve online querious rental license#
I was given the task of obtaining 10-12 billion ISK through rental agreements and had a license to rent as much of Tenerifis as needed to achieve that goal. I easily met and surpassed that target in a matter of days flipping renters that had lost any hope of protection by their former masters. In 2011, after the fall of the Northern Coalition to the Drone Russian forces, Controlled Chaos thought it would be a good idea to give up our seven technetium moons in Pure Blind and join Red Alliance’s effort to consolidate power in the South. With just a handful of neodymium moons in our portfolio, it was not long into the conflict that we badly needed ISK. Renters typically pay a rate based on their corporation size in this model. Test’s Honey Badger Coalition is probably the largest example of this model ever used. This “sov-less white trash” model is a poor value, as it deprives renters of sov benefits – chiefly beacons, planetary interaction, and fuel bonuses for towers.
Less common rental models do exist, such as the rental of a shared pool of space or where the rental alliance holds no sovereignty. Landlords generally prefer to hold sov in outpost systems, with the tenant joining a rental alliance as a corporation. However, if your ego or space plans demand it, owning your own outpost as a nullsec alliance leader is within your reach if you have the ISK. Furthermore, building supers is often allowed, but is not recommended, with landlords being non-committal over the defense of a renter CSAA. Slavery and serfdom gimmicks aside, renting is simply an agreement made by players who want to reap the bounty and content of nullsec without the burden of commitments to a nullsec corporation or alliance. Pricing is typically based on security status and can be adjusted up or down based desirable factors such as a large amount of belts, dead end systems (low traffic), ice belts, and the presence of an outpost – see figure 1. As long as the bills are paid, and the rules are followed, access to the space and blue standings are guaranteed.
0 kommentar(er)
